January 28, 2026

Market Research Requests Aren’t Proposals. Stop Treating Them Like One.

If you’re responding to a market research request like it’s a mini-proposal, you’re doing it wrong. And you’re probably making the government’s job harder in the process.

Market research is not a sales exercise. It’s not a downselect. It’s not your moment to prove you’re “best in class.”

It’s the government trying to figure out what they should buy, how risky it is, how much it should cost, and how to structure the acquisition so it doesn’t blow up later.

Your response isn’t meant to sell them. It’s meant to help them think.

What the Government Is Actually Using These For

Market research responses don’t disappear into a black hole. They get pulled into internal conversations most contractors never see.

Program teams use them to shape:

  • Requirements
  • Budget estimates
  • Contract type decisions
  • Acquisition strategy
  • Risk assessments

Your response becomes background material. Internal memos. Slides to leadership. Talking points for contracting, legal, and finance.

If your content can’t be reused internally without someone translating it out of marketing language, it’s not helping.

Why the Salesy Approach Misses the Mark

Here’s what I see all the time:

  • Pages of company hype no one asked for
  • “We’re uniquely qualified” statements with no context
  • Overpromising that quietly raises red flags
  • Vague answers that avoid the hard parts

None of that helps the government make decisions. It just creates more work for them.

And no, silence afterward doesn’t mean you blew it.

Silence Is Not Rejection

This part trips people up.

When you submit a market research response and hear nothing, that doesn’t mean you’re out. It usually means the opposite.

They’re working.

They’re comparing inputs. Reconciling feedback. Aligning internally. Talking through scope, budget, risk, and acquisition strategy with people who were not on the original request.

Market research is upstream. It’s slow, messy, and internal. There is rarely a neat “thanks, we loved your response” email at the end.

No response doesn’t equal no interest. It equals process.

A Better Way to Think About It

The strongest market research responses read like something the government could copy, paste, and reuse internally.

You’re not trying to win yet. You’re helping them frame the problem the right way.

That means your response should feel closer to an internal memo than a sales pitch.

What That Actually Looks Like

1. Explain the market, not just yourself

Instead of leading with your capabilities, explain:

  • Common approaches agencies use for this type of work
  • Variations in scope and complexity
  • What tends to work and what doesn’t

You’re educating, not posturing.

2. Acknowledge tradeoffs

Every option has pros and cons. Say that out loud.

  • Faster timelines usually mean less oversight
  • More flexibility often means more risk
  • Tighter requirements can reduce risk but limit innovation

Government buyers live in tradeoff land. Show them you understand it.

3. Help them pressure-test budget

They’re not asking for your price. They’re sanity-checking theirs.

Explain:

  • What actually drives cost
  • What assumptions matter
  • Where underfunding causes problems later

This helps them defend the number internally.

4. Think about acquisition risk, not just performance risk

Execution isn’t the only thing keeping them up at night.

Address:

  • Contract structure considerations
  • Common acquisition pitfalls
  • What makes requirements clearer and easier to award

If you help reduce protest risk or award delays, you’re adding real value.

The Quiet Advantage Most Contractors Miss

When you help the government think through the problem, you influence:

  • How requirements are written
  • How scope is defined
  • How risk is allocated
  • How evaluation criteria are structured

Not by selling. By being useful.

When the RFP eventually drops and it feels oddly familiar, that’s not an accident.

Bottom Line

Market research requests are not practice proposals. They’re the blueprint stage.

Stop selling. Start informing.

And don’t panic when it goes quiet. That silence usually means your input is being used, not ignored.

Krystn Macomber

CP APMP Fellow, LEED

There’s magic in disrupting the ordinary. This is the philosophy Krystn brings to working with and empowering her clients. With a 20-year track record of helping global professional services enterprises, Krystn is redefining what’s possible for companies looking to elevate their marketing, pursuit, and business development operations. She is an industry leader, award winner, mentor, coach, and highly sought-after speaker.

Previous Blog
Next Blog
December 29, 2025
Capture Management 101: The Steps, the Strategy, and the Stuff Everyone Skips

If you want to win consistently, you need capture — and you need to do it with intention. This guide breaks it down: the steps, the strategy, and yes… the parts everyone conveniently ignores.

Read More
December 15, 2025
Stop Guessing What the Customer Wants

Every year, companies lose winnable pursuits for the simplest reason imaginable: they guessed what the customer wanted instead of knowing what the customer needed. Understanding the customer shouldn’t be a competitive advantage. It should be the baseline.

Read More